<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Healthcare Strategy on Paras Katyal</title>
    <link>https://paraskatyal.com/tags/healthcare-strategy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Healthcare Strategy on Paras Katyal</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://paraskatyal.com/tags/healthcare-strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Quality Measures in Healthcare: What They Are and Why They&#39;re Hard to Get Right</title>
      <link>https://paraskatyal.com/blog/digital-health-hype-vs-reality/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://paraskatyal.com/blog/digital-health-hype-vs-reality/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Healthcare organizations talk a lot about quality. But if you ask what &amp;ldquo;quality&amp;rdquo; actually means in practice — how it&amp;rsquo;s defined, who measures it, and what happens when the numbers look bad — the answers get complicated fast.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s a plain-language breakdown of how quality measurement works in healthcare, and why getting it right is harder than it looks.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;hr&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;why-we-measure-quality-at-all&#34;&gt;Why We Measure Quality at All&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For most of history, healthcare quality was assessed informally — reputation, credentials, patient feedback. The problem with that approach is that it&amp;rsquo;s not scalable, not consistent, and not particularly reliable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
